CheerupSilver Very Cool!!!

Brendon Jones It’s fine. It's literally the definition of a fine movie. You’ve seen it before, you know every beat and outcome before the characters even do. Only question is how much escapism you’re looking for.

Payno I think this is a new genre that they're all sort of working their way through it and haven't got all the kinks worked out yet but it's a genre that works for me.

Cheryl A clunky actioner with a handful of cool moments.

kjohoy Loved this film, smart & funny. Characters are relatable.

dallaswhiskey Many romance movies are essentially about infidelity. The girlfriends, boyfriends and spouses are just sort of extras in the way of the love story. This always makes the story less romantic to me. At least this movie doesn't deny it, since the issue of cheating is actually talked about throughout the movie. Wallace has a friend Allan whose current relationship started with cheating, and neither Allan or his girlfriend Nicole seem to see anything wrong with that, quite the contrary.The writing is good and there are some genuinely funny moments with Wallace and Chantry joking with one another. I also like the scene where Chantry's bitchy-but-not-completely-evil sister is about to tell her a vicious lie about Wallace but then apparently changes her mind mid-sentence and ends up turning the story into a joke, saying something like "and then the cops came and Wallace shot them all in the head, he's such a jerk".I don't get the comparisons to "When Harry met Sally". Wallace has a crush on Chantry from the first time they meet, and it's hardly one-sided either, so theirs is never a real friendship like that of Harry and Sally. This movie is also nowhere near as sweet, most of the characters don't come out very likable at all, and it's just not as good either.

Dee Mou It'll always be difficult to picture Daniel Radcliffe outside of Hogwarts, but this was a great transitional film that lets his personality shine the way the more recent films don't.The film is well well written and cast -- peppered with well-timed humor about the insanity more commonly referred to as falling in love. Bravo Dowse, Matsai, Dawe and Rinaldi!The graphic art was lovely (no spoilers, but I'd actually really like to see more work by the artist). Zoe Kazan, whose work I only got to see in "I Hate Valentine's Day" (Vardalos) was the perfect counterpart for Radcliffe in this romcom.If you enjoy slightly sarcastic romcoms and haven't seen it, go ahead and Netflix it.

areatw Here we have yet another bland and predictable romantic comedy that will undoubtedly be forgotten by the vast majority of viewers within the space of a few weeks. We know exactly what is going to happen right from the very beginning, so what exactly is the point of the film? It's nothing new and the story has been done a million times before.As for the 'comedy' aspect of this romantic comedy, it's very much hit and miss, with more misses than hits. Daniel Radcliffe just doesn't convince me at all as an actor, and certainly not as a comedy actor. Perhaps it's because I see Potter and not Radcliffe when he appears on screen, but this type of role just doesn't suit him as an actor.'What If' is another generic romantic comedy that brings absolutely nothing new to the genre. Perhaps suitable to the time for those who like these cheesy, predictable type of romance films.