Greenes Please don't spend money on this.

Konterr Brilliant and touching

Glucedee It's hard to see any effort in the film. There's no comedy to speak of, no real drama and, worst of all.

Ortiz Excellent and certainly provocative... If nothing else, the film is a real conversation starter.

stnbwen I have never seen a judge so disrespectful in my life. You have little to be a Judge no comion so nasty are you. Look into your own problems with your life.

photogbill I have to it I'm somewhat of a "reality TV" fan. While some might be obviously fake ...others seem to be mostly genuine & entertaining at the same time! Unfortunately for the legitimate litigants filing justifiable law suits who've been duped into dropping their real court cases to appear on the "Judge" Judy show ...they've chosen a farce, a mockery of the legal system ....one that should be brought before the REAL legal system ITSELF, with severe consequences to all those involved in producing & creating this travesty of justice scam. While I enjoy the humor, common sense, fairness & human comion displayed on other "Court TV" shows like Judge Milian & Judge Mathis ...NONE of that exists on JJ's show! I've rarely watched her show in the past because of her supreme rudeness & incomprehensible arrogance, I chose to watch a couple episodes today ...after priorly being thoroughly entertained by the Judge Mathis Show. Although her "courtroom" demeanor displays her equal hatred towards everyone who comes before her ....she came across as totally biased, unfair and she incredibly implied she had some inert ability to read people's minds & hearts! She's obviously suffering from a 'God complex' with narcissistic sociopathic tendencies! It's also obvious that she makes her decisions solely based on her personal dislike of one litigant over the other but dislikes BOTH to some degree ...discarding evidence, insulting litigants & disparaging their character & integrity with little more than her SELF- Perceived superior intellect & imagined 'sixth sense'! After watching the show I decided to do a little google search & found that the evidence against her & her fake courtroom show is even worse than I suspected! Besides all the numerous complaints here on IMDb ... at a Consumer Affairs web site, I found numerous complaints from actual legitimate litigants who were deceived into dropping their "real" court cases to appear on the show before her ...were repeatedly lied to by the production company & their staff, threatened, cajoled, encouraged to lie about their cases, given last-minute documents to sign prior to the airing of their case that exonerated & excluded Judy (she doesn't deserve the title "Judge") from following any legal standings or statutes! These people were REAL people who had given up their REAL court cases and had their legal rights trampled on ...sometimes with dire consequences both financial & personal!The fact that her fake Courtroom TV Show has been awarded an Emmy Award is clear evidence of the decadence & immorality that is Hollywood today! Since this behavior isn't exactly new to the JJ Show ...CBS should be ashamed of itself for not cancelling this vile travesty of justice, a long time ago!

Dave This is a reality series about small claims cases, headed by Judy Sheindlin. It has been running since 1996 and nearly two thousand episodes have been broadcast.Sheindlin has a dreadful, unprofessional, arrogant attitude. She frequently snaps at the people involved in the cases. She's inpatient and angry - often interrupting them mid-sentence to shout at them in a patronising, sneering way.Some cases are fabricated.

Ezjm ezjm When someone is in the wrong, she is very good about handling them and 'shaming' them. However, she handles everyone this way even the innocent which becomes a problemSeveral cases of ignoring evidence just because they don't like the litigant or it doesn't match their predetermined rulings they have in their mind before the case even began.When litigants will tell their testimony, then the judges assume that just because something doesn't sound like 'common sense' or it's not the action they personally would have done, then the person must be lying. This is another cognitive bias they need to learn to get rid of.She also interrupts them excessively when they are trying to give their testimony. Refuses to listen to testimony and says 'I've already heard enough I've made up my mind' when the litigant has only said a sentence or two and clearly has more to say and more evidence to show. She cuts them off constantly and then wonders why 'everyones' stories sound shady to her because she won't listen to anyone for more than 10 seconds before interrupting.Several times she ended the case early when the litigants had further evidence which she didn't even look at because she was too busy talking, and then she has to stop and listen (but usually ignores it anyways) because clearly she rather would be doing something else.Edit: I also find the positive reviews on here giving it 10 stars are pretty hilarious, if you think Judy actually treats litigants reasonably you haven't been paying attention, although I'm sure her ridiculous behavior is for show, if it wasn't a show she would have gotten let go for malpractice for ignoring evidence and arbitrary decisions a long time ago.