ChicDragon It's a mild crowd pleaser for people who are exhausted by blockbusters.

Taraparain Tells a fascinating and unsettling true story, and does so well, without pretending to have all the answers.

Invaderbank The film creates a perfect balance between action and depth of basic needs, in the midst of an infertile atmosphere.

Marva-nova Amazing worth wacthing. So good. Biased but well made with many good points.

ineedchicken Well if you want to be a jerk... I'll point out that in Pulp Fiction the scene was a little different. The bullets did not miss Samuel L. They went through him. Watch it again and see when he moves to look at the wall behind him. The bullet holes are directly behind where he was standing. And i would be willing to bet Tarrentino did not invent this scene either. He just happened to make it in a popular movie. I give Montana an EXCELLENT rating because it is not mainstream and some characters are more interesting (i.e. they don't say everything on their mind, so you have to figure them out). I like having to judge characters by observing behavior. There are many better movies with better directors, but this movie reminds me to figure things out on my own. These kind of movies can be much more stimulating. The only mystery in Pulp Fiction was what was in the case... so what.

DJAkin I have NEVER heard of this movie but it turned out to be a fun view. Sure, it never made it big but heck, it has a good cast. Even John Ritter delivers the goods as a corrupt informercial man. I liked the way Stanley Tucci delivered the goods as a hitman. He was flawless and very confident everytime he shot that weapon. Kyra S (Kevin Bacon's Wife) was very good as a bold hitwoman. She delivered the goods as a woman who believed in her profession yet had a soft side for Tucci. The main BOSSMAN was played by that one fat wizard from Harry Potter. He was good and very ruthless as well. In once scene he threatened to cut the fingers off of a chinese man with a gardening tool! I would give this movie a 4 or 5 out of 10 but that's it.

Rogue-32 This is most definitely an over-the-top film, starting off sick and getting progressively sicker and sucking you in during the process. the characters are well-defined and well-realized, especially Philip Seymour Hoffman's smarmy, reptilian Duncan, Robin Tunney's not-as-dumb-or-pathetic-as-she-appears Kitty and Sedgwick's hardboiled-on-the-outside Claire. Of course the film belongs to Stanley Tucci, the film's dying hitman. Another sublime, subtle performance from this extraordinarily talented actor; he actually manages to give this brutal excursion a heart.

L-Jet I just saw Montana for the first time last night. The fact that my weak attention span was insistent that I finish it means I must have liked it at least reasonably well, but on a more conscious level I know this movie is not all that good. I really want to note that if the writing team and/or director stole from any director, it was probably much more Peckinpah than Tarantino. The story gives the violence a kind of nihilistic "this is the way we really are" quality that Tarantino has never addressed (nor does he need to; this is not a value judgement), but is Sam Peckinpah country. I think what kept me at it was outstanding acting all around, no wasted time editing (except for the one or two overly long firefights) and the possibility of new beginnings for very damaged people, which is neither Peckinpah or Tarantino in character. Just one more note, Robbie Coltrane's part does seem underwritten; one really irritating flaw in the movie.Gotta get back to tying the rebar. L