NASA's Unexplained Files

NASA's Unexplained Files 342c1k

2012
NASA's Unexplained Files
Watch on
NASA's Unexplained Files
Watch on

NASA's Unexplained Files 342c1k

6.4 | TV-G | en | Documentary

Dive into the mysteries of some of NASA’s most curious missions and explore stories of engineering achievement and human endurance. Each episode offers first hand testimony from astronauts, NASA mission footage, plus beautifully rendered CGI to bring to life these voyages that reveal unexplained sightings that have dogged many of NASA’s most famous missions.

View More
Watch Now

6
5
4
3
2
1
SEE MORE
SEE MORE
SEE MORE
SEE MORE
SEE MORE
SEE MORE
6.4 | TV-G | en | Talk | More Info
Released: 2012-03-27 | Released Producted By: Discovery , Wag TV Country: United States of America Budget: 0 Revenue: 0 Official Website: https://www.sciencechannel.com/tv-shows/nasas-unexplained-files/
info

Dive into the mysteries of some of NASA’s most curious missions and explore stories of engineering achievement and human endurance. Each episode offers first hand testimony from astronauts, NASA mission footage, plus beautifully rendered CGI to bring to life these voyages that reveal unexplained sightings that have dogged many of NASA’s most famous missions.

Genre

Talk

Watch Online

NASA's Unexplained Files (2012) is now streaming with subscription on Discovery+ Entertainment

Cast

Director

Producted By

Discovery , Wag TV

NASA's Unexplained Files Videos and Images 3d3c2o

View All
  • Top Credited Cast
  • |
  • Crew

NASA's Unexplained Files Audience Reviews 423c1s

Diagonaldi Very well executed
BlazeLime Strong and Moving!
Yash Wade Close shines in drama with strong language, adult themes.
Brennan Camacho Mostly, the movie is committed to the value of a good time.
adampadum Mysteries exist all over the world and I for one love them.not everything can be so easily explained by scientists.i think it's more ridiculous to believe we are the only life in the vast universe
aussie-54406 While this show seems to present some facts it is so hyped and sensationalized that it often comes across as hokey. While I love science,especially relating to space, and being entertained, I don't like being talked down to and treated like an idiot. Way over dramatic, sensationalized editing and presentation. Not a good ment for astronomy. Presenting the facts in an interesting and factual manner doesn't mean the show will be boring an uninteresting. Virtually every segment I have seen features a breathless announcer and/ or commentator saying, in carefully cut and edited dialogue, what seems to be an announcement that someone has died, aliens have been discovered and hidden or there has been a disaster of some kind. NOT ONCE has this related to the actual outcome. And "files"? I think not.
LBucci-199-621094 This show examines some of the more unusual, mysterious and scary things that have happened to NASA astronauts, People videoing unusual events, strange happenings, it has it all. The most amazing aspect of the show is that they are objective with most segments. A great bit of viewing and very well done. Nick Pope and Bill Bird all add to the show and the they also have covered some unique subjects not before seen by me and I will search high and low for the latest and do not miss much. This is light, informative and enlightening for the UFO enthusiast, Paranormal seekers and skeptic's alike. It offer all points of view and is well researched so to not leave an impression or true or false and leaves that choice up to you. True or false isn't always easy to spot with some of the story lines. You need to watch these shows, they are excellent."It's Science Jim, just not as we know it." Bones from Star trek :)
Brett Martin Moore First in the 2015 series: Tungusta Russia - Ice meteor exploding over ground. Plausible. Monolith on one of Mars moon... Just a bolder standing on end. Plausible. Crashed UFO in the US.. part of a soviet Satellite doing a re-entry. Documents went missing. Eye witnesses stated it was a controlled entry and the object made a fish hook fly over which clearly demonstrates it was under control. Anything not would enter in a straight line. Black ops military took over site. Took large object away. Space Shuttle challenger: Picture of lightening strike at time it started to break apart: In picture you see a solid line from the challenger going past. Then you see another intersecting line with a starting point above. Their excuse.. Camera moved from delayed shutter. Problem with this excuse: Millions of people use the same technique to take pictures of stars etc. No shutter movement. and Secondly, if there was shutter movement, why are there two lines not just one. The main line showing the shuttle should also have taken a wobble. It is not scientifically possible to have two lines unless it was a double exposure which also cant happen unless the challenger went past twice... This series is worse than Project Blue Book. The entire premise of the show is to make you think that we have the answers for everything and nothing strange is going on beyond what the show suggests. Anyone with common sense can see this show is a dud !

Copyright © 2016 - 2025 gowatching.voirdesfilms.net